THE 'REVOLUTION' and CAPITALISM
(Author's note: One of the readers noticed
this essay cross referenced in an essay already included on the web site.
She specifically requested it. In satisfying her request, I realized that
the essay "The Seattle Riots of '99" is a close spiritual relative of
this one. As a result, it will be posted directly after and it is suggested
they be read together.)
I'd like to begin this essay by quoting one
of the finest pieces of literature this writer has ever had the good fortune
to read, that being the novel, "El Siglo de las Luces" (The Century
of Lights), by Alejo Carpentier. Carpentier's passage through this life
is worth mention; a Cuban whose father was French, he was actively involved
in Cuba's 1959 revolution, eventually becoming a diplomat for Castro's
regime in Paris, where he recently died. There were rumors, at the time
of his death, hinting at an estrangement with his government, although
his passing was treated with great reverence in Cuba. I'm sure I state
not only my own opinion when I call him one of this century's greatest
writers.
The Century of Lights is a historical novel dealing
with the decade or so surrounding the French Revolution both in France,
and, even more so, in the Caribbean. Near the end of the work, Esteban,
who has been involved with the revolution on both sides of the Atlantic,
has returned to his native Havana. He is a broken and disillusioned man,
having lived the frustrations and failures of the great social upheaval.
He speaks to his cousin Sofia, with whom he was raised in the same house.
"This time the Revolution has failed. Maybe the next one will be the good
one, but you'll have to come looking for me with a lantern in broad daylight
to get me involved in it. Be careful with words that are too beautiful,
of Paradises and Utopias created with words. Our era has succumbed to
an excess of words. The only Promised Land we can find on this Earth is
that we can find within ourselves." To which Sofia, a bohemian spirit
in spite of her upper class lineage, replied: "One cannot live without
a political ideal; the good fortune and well being of the people cannot
be gotten on the first try. Certainly, grave errors have been committed
but these errors will serve as useful teachings in the future. (.) The
excesses of the revolution were deplorable, but great human advances are
only accomplished with pain and sacrifice."
How timeless and universal these two positions are; broken
faith and eternal hope. At this point in history the Russians and other
crest fallen seekers with "political ideals" must be relating quite closely
to Esteban's broken faith. Yet for me, and I'd guess for Carpentier as
well, Sofia's reply will always be the only valid way to see things.
Esteban's "next one" arrived in Russia in 1917. Have the "grave
errors" of the past served as "useful teachings in the future"?
On balance, and in spite of the abuse western pundits would
heap upon such opinion, I would have to say yes. While not meaning to
make light of some "deplorable excesses", the people who waged the Russian
Revolution have now had four generations at the helm, have accustomed
themselves to both the privilege and burden of such responsibility, and
are not about to give it up.
But here is where I throw in a curve ball.
"The Revolution", as perceived by Marx, Lenin, Castro, Esteban
and Sofia, as well as the mobs at the Bastille and the Winter Palace,
that is, as lower social classes rising up to throw off the yolk of their
oppressors, is an outmoded concept caused, ironically, by the successes
of capitalism.
I consider the way of life or system of values created around
such concepts as capitalism, the free market, consumerism, and, in my
own word, The Premise (see essay "The Economy"), to be the principle roadblock
to our species' quest for some kind of higher realization. But the ideas
embodied in this excessively mercantile-material system have also given
mankind its greatest leap forward in the history of the planet. In order
to insure the system's success, as many people as possible must be able
to buy the goods produced. This has changed the "masses" from an army
of mule labor into an important segment of consumers. You don't have to
be Adam Smith to know that K-Mart is no fun without money. I am not qualified
to get any more specific than that, but I know this concept has helped
create more wealth, more goods, more technological advancements, more
social mobility, more self-esteem for more people, than ever before. It
has made the idea of class warfare a less relevant factor.
But it has outlived its usefulness. It is beginning to create
more social problems than it is worth. Its competitive nature, its aggressive
attitude, its self-centered adolescent egoism, its quest for "success",
the pressures not to "fail", its delirious, trivial attempts to ward off
the boredom caused by an almost purely material way of seeing things,
are all beginning to reap its crop of neurosis, violence, depression,
insecurity and environmental ugliness beyond acceptable levels. The fundamental
question is this: is the promulgation of more and more business activity
improving the quality of life on this planet? Or, put another way, what's
good or bad for the "economy" isn't really the question, but whether the
"economy" is good for us.
The next great task for humanity is to harness this technology
and the system's ability to produce in a more rational way. As a species,
we still have the mentality of the hunter or subsistence farmer fearful
for one's day to day survival. Technologically we are over that hump but
our emotional outlook is lagging behind. This wonderful technology, currently
being used almost exclusively for the military protection of material
interests and the perpetration of excessive business production, could
give us the quality time necessary to truly develop our full potential
as human beings. This potential is now being squandered in the rat race
of superfluous materialism.
The next "Revolution" will not be class warfare, but rather,
an uprising against the Tyranny of Business. This Tyranny, possessed of
the most powerful persuasionary tools the world has ever seen, is shaping
every aspect of our lives. It is creating our personalities, our desires,
our needs, our concepts of ourselves. It is not objective. It doesn't
care what's right, wrong, better or worse. It only wants our money. It
is a despotic robot without a soul. It will not be easily defeated.
Long live the "Revolution".
Relevant Material: In describing two crucified
men during the days of Jesus Christ, the author writes: "Flies were already
visibly and audibly busy about the wounds, in hands and feet, blessed
creatures of God about their elemental affairs, above man's wickedness
and tortured attempts to find an acceptable mode of social and moral order."
From the novel, "Man of Nazareth", by the singular English genius,
Anthony Burgess.
There is a wonderful novel about the life of the
Mexican bandit-revolutionary, Pancho Villa, written by the Texan, Earl
Shorris. It is entitled "Under the Fifth Sun". There is a fascinating
moment when Villa lies with his regular whore while being held as a political
prisoner. The prostitute is a Mary Magdalena of sorts, constantly encouraging
Villa in his revolutionary fervor. I quote from the book: " . she lay
at his side and whispered that war and poverty were sisters, the wounds
of one no less than the other. He said she was a soldier. She answered
that she'd gladly be a soldier, but only if there was a revolution. Anything
else is just a war. If it's not a revolution, being a soldier is just
a frivolous whim."
"I don't believe in being a failure. Only
one who looks to be a success can be considered a failure, but being a
success is the ambition of mediocre people. What matters is nobility of
spirit." From the great satirical novel, "La Bella Durmiente Va a
la Escuela" (Sleeping Beauty Goes to School), by the Spanish master,
Gonzalo Torrente Ballester.
|